| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerMost Recent Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer Archive |

Proving sexual orientation discrimination can be challenging
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff (the person bringing the suit) to show a direct correlation between sexual orientation and whatever adverse action was taken by the employer. This can be difficult to prove since employers typically do not acknowledge discriminatory activities. Most cases of discrimination are based on circumstantial evidence.
Three steps are involved in cases relying on circumstantial proof of intentional discrimination.
So in cases alleging intentional discriminatory actions, you carry the ultimate burden of persuading a court that the actions of your employer were motivated by a discriminatory intent regarding your sexual orientation. Having an experienced New York City labor law attorney to guide your case and help you gather evidence, witnesses and expert testimony can make the difference in having a successful resolution to your complaint.
The Derek T. Smith Law Group,
P.C.
30 Broad Street, 35th Floor
New York, New York 10004
(877) 469-5297
www.akinandsmith.com
